Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

209 Wis. 2d 281

562 N.W.2d 151

State v. Watson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1997

Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 1997-05-02

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the order of the circuit court on the charge of attempted first degree intentional homicide. Justice Donald W. Steinmetz, Justice Jon P. Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would affirm; Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would reverse. . . . [W]e vacate our order granting certification and remand the cause to the court of appeals .... Shirley S. Abrahamson, Chief Justice, did not participate.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond

Relies on 191 Wis. 2d 395 - State v. Richard Knutson, Inc. · 195 Wis. 2d 683 - State v. Elam

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-05-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2017

10 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 ¶ 1. The court is equally divided whether to affirm or reverse the order of the circuit court. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice William A. Bablitch and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley would affirm. Justice Jon P. Wilcox, Justice Janine P. Geske and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Donald W. Steinmetz did not participate.

¶2 ¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule; declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue).

¶3*283 ¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.

/209/wis2d/281 · .json · Public domain