209 Wis. 2d 577 - State v. Jagodinsky’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “that other factors motivated his decision, such as education and employment. Id. The trial court found that the mere fact that the prosecution used its four strikes to strike all males did not establish a prima facie case of discrimination and that it was accepting the prosecutor's explanations that he had used”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 215 Wis. 2d 295 - State v. King

2. “'[My selections were] not based upon gender alone. ... To say gender isn’t an issue would be a lie to the Court, but there are a lot of other things, education, employment. And considerations such as those are also in the back of my mind when I pick a jury.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 215 Wis. 2d 295 - State v. King

3. “In circumstances such as this, where the challenged party admits reliance on a prohibited discriminatory characteristic, we do not see how a response that other factors were also used is sufficient rebuttal under the second prong of Batson.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 215 Wis. 2d 295 - State v. King