Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 A3D 326 - State v. Enos

State v. Enos’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Robinson · Berthiaume v. SCHOOL COM. OF CITY OF WOONSOCKET · Brennan v. Kirby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must determine whether the evidence would cause the jurors to be so inflamed as to make them unable to decide the case on the basis of the evidence presented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(1) the length of time of the relationship; “(2) the type of the relationship; “(3) the frequence [sic ] of the interaction between the parties.” 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “truth.” See, e.g., The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1624 (4th ed.2006) (defining the word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.