Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 A.3d 408 - State v. Cipriano

State v. Cipriano’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gomez · State v. Gordon · State v. Dame · State v. Imbruglia · State v. Jenison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When ruling on a motion to pass, the trial justice must assess the prejudicial impact of the statement in question on the jury and 'determine whether the evidence was of such a nature as to cause the jurors to become so inflamed that their attention was distracted from the issues submitted to them.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e previously have held that even prejudicial remarks do not necessarily require the granting of a motion to pass.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is well settled that 'a trial justice's decision on a motion to pass the case is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial justice, and this Court will not disturb the ruling on such a motion absent an abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.