Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 A.D.2d 4 - Ramos v. Shumavon

Ramos v. Shumavon’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1993

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

401964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co. · Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp. · Smyth v. . City of New York · Rigney v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The plaintiffs point to no other provisions of the `contract documents' — nor do we find any — as could be said to impose an obligation upon the defendants to insure the safety of the workmen. As we read the pertinent documents the defendants were hired, in effect, to see to it that the State obtained the end product it bargained for — a properly constructed portion of the expressway. There being no contractual duty regarding the safety of the workmen the judgment against these defendants may not stand and the complaint must be dismissed." Id. at 8, 247 N.Y.S.2d at 703 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Krieger v. J. E. Greiner Co.
  2. “CONDUCT OF WORK. The Contractor shall, by working methods and orders of procedure subject to the approval of the Engineer, conduct the work in the most expeditious manner possible, having due regard for the safety of persons and property and safety for traffic, and for reducing to a minimum the encumbrance of the streets and site of the work with construction materials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. C. W. Regan, Inc., a New York Corporation, and Nager Electric Company, Inc., Etc. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, C. W. Regan, Inc., a New York Corporation, and Nager Electric Company, Inc., Etc. v. Bernard F. Diamond, Individually and T/a Diamond Construction Company
  3. “ARTICLE 1. Work to be Done and Contract Documents. The Engineer shall ascertain the standard practices of the State prior to the execution of any of the work required by this Agreement. All work under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with these standard practices and the provisions of the contract documents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. C. W. Regan, Inc., a New York Corporation, and Nager Electric Company, Inc., Etc. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, C. W. Regan, Inc., a New York Corporation, and Nager Electric Company, Inc., Etc. v. Bernard F. Diamond, Individually and T/a Diamond Construction Company

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.