People v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record establishes that defendant approached the two victims and shot the first victim [Preston Mitchum] in the chest, which eventually caused the death of that victim, and defendant then shot the second victim [Christoper Jones, who suffered non-fatal wounds]. The first victim ran after being shot, but defendant did not follow him. Instead, defendant approached the second victim, stood over him, and continued to shoot him from inches away, pulling the trigger of his weapon while aiming it at the second victim even after there was no remaining ammunition. We thus conclude that a rational jury could have had a reasonable doubt with respect to whether defendant’s acts were “specifically designed to cause the death of the [first] victim” (People v. Gonzalez, 1 N.Y.3d 464, 467 [ 775 N.Y.S.2d 224 , 807 N.E.2d 273 ] (2004); see People v. Garbutt, 9 A.D.3d 255 [ 780 N.Y.S.2d 126 ] (2004), lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 674 [ 784 N.Y.S.2d 12 , 817 N.E.2d 830 ] (2004)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.