Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ala. 448

Shomo v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1852

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1852-06-15

Tried before the Hon. L. GtbboNS. B. 0. Caldwell brought an action of detinue against D. T. Sbomo for the recovery of two slaves, named Edgar and Abram. On the trial of the cause in the court below, the facts of the case were agreed on by the parties, and are these: On the 15th day of November, 1829, David Tate made a deed of gift to his sister, Bosanna Shomo, wife of Joseph Shomo, of certain slaves, including the two before named.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1904

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1852-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LIGON, J.

¶1— When the plaintiff in an action of detinue has color of title, and has had peaceable possession of the chattel sued for, he can recover as against.a mere wrong-doer who, by indirection or force, obtains and holds the present possession.

¶2Such is the case here; and without reference to the rights of Mrs. Shomo in equity, if she has any, we think Caldwell is placed, by his bill of sale, and his possession under it, in such a position with relation to the slaves in controversy, as to entitle him to recover of the defendant in the court below in this form of action.

¶3There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is consequently affirmed.

/21/ala/448 · .json · Public domain