Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ala. App. 109 - Finderson v. State

21 Ala. App. 109 - Finderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1947
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shields v. State · 20 Ala. App. 627 - Shepard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This inquiry, and the manner with which it was made, was improper — had no place in this trial. Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35 , 16 So. 85 , 53 Am.St.Rep. 17 , and numerous cases therein cited. If the purpose of this examination was to test the estimate as to good character entertained by the witness, it should have been conducted in a different manner; the rule applicable thereto being plain and simple. Here the manner of cross-examination was highly prejudicial, and was calculated to seriously, erroneously, and injuriously affect the substantial rights of the defendant. Its tendency was to' defeat the fair and impartial trial, free from prejudice, accorded to defendant under the Constitution and law of this state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““You say this negro has a good reputation down there — he has been convicted several times for selling liquor, hasn’t he?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.