Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ala. App. 160

105 So 912

Booth v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1925

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1925-11-03

Relies on 16 Ala. App. 531 - Sanders v. State · Lawrence v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-11-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1986

13 state decisions

401925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

RICE, J.

¶1 The defendants were jointly charged, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws. The proceedings were had on an affidavit and warrant made before and issued by S. C. Rolen, a justice of the peace in and for Bibb county, and made returnable to the circuit court. There was no plea in abatement interposed by defendants in the circuit court; so there was no error which this court will review. Sanders v. State, 16 Ala. App. 531, 79 So. 312.

¶2 There was ample evidence to support the judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury, and, there being no error apparent on the record, the case is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/21/alaapp/160 · .json · Public domain