21 Ala. App. 172 - Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1966
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . . Of course, under this rule, when evidence offered is patently and palpably inadmissible for any purpose, a general objection is sufficient to justify its exclusion; and it is the correct practice when interposing even a general objection to predicate such objection on the grounds that it is illegal, incompetent, immaterial, and inadmissible.....” Cox v. State, 21 Ala.App. 172 , 106 So. 71 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Loyd v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.