Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ala. App. 234 - Jones v. State

21 Ala. App. 234 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably 43 Ala. App. 454 - Leonard v. State (1966), 31 Ala. App. 608 - Bringhurst v. State (1945)

58 state decisions

1401926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Gonzalez · Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Carter · Florence Cotton & Iron Co. v. Field · 18 Ala. App. 277 - Baxley v. State · Wolffe v. Minnis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The trial court did not err in reading to the jury that part of the ordinances of Birmingham regulating the operating of motor vehicles in said city. One of the questions involved in the inquiry incident to this prosecution was the gross negligence of the defendant in operating the automobile driven by him. If defendant was driving the automobile in violation of the city ordinance, that fact should be considered on the question of gross negligence."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Justice is blind, says the law, and in her judgment must see no man, color, race, or condition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.