Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ala. App. 289 - Douglass v. State

21 Ala. App. 289 - Douglass v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
1
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 1989 · most notably Parsons v. State (1948), Goldin v. State (1961)

2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

3301926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parsons v. State · Howard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no statutory robbery in this state. The common law prevails in Alabama as to this offense; and robbery, at common law, is an offense against both person and property, and is briefly defined as the felonious taking of money, or goods of value, from the person of another, or in his presence, 'by violence to his person, or by putting him in fear. The only statute on the subject of robbery in this state is section 5460 of the Code of 1923, and this statute merely prescribes the punishment for the commission of the common-law offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “• “To constitute robbery it is necessary, of course, that the property taken should be that of some other person than him who takes it, but it is not necessary that it should be the property of the person from whom it is taken.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.