SAMFORD, J.
¶1
The rulings of the court on the admission of testimony were patently free from error.
¶2
The argument of the solicitor, to which exception was taken was legitimate.
¶3
Refused charge 2 omits the doctrine of retreat. Refused charge 3 was the’ general charge, and refused charge 4 invades the province of the jury. They were all properly refused. Jones v. State, 20 Ala. App. 660 104 So. 771 Tatum v. State , 20 Ala. App. 436 102 So. 726
¶4
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
¶5
Affirmed.
Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code
Case posture Posture Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; C. P. Almon, Judge.
William Woods, alias Wood, was convicted of first degree manslaughter, and he appeals. Affirmed.
See, also, 19 Ala. App. 299 , 97 So. 179 ; 20 Ala. App. 200 , 101 So. 314 .
Charges 2 and 4, refused to defendant, are as follows:
(2) If you find from the evidence that the defendant was free from fault in bringing on the difficulty, and only shot to save his own life from a danger, either real or apparent, then you must find him not guilty.
(4) There is not evidence that more than one shot struck deceased; the evidence shows that he fell after the second shot, and the fact that two shots were fired later, neither of which struck him, will not affect his right of self-defense. Cross reference See, also, 19 Ala. App. 299, 97 So. 179;. 20 Ala. App. 200, 101 So. 314. Source: CourtListener
