Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ala. App. 652

111 So 606

Alford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1926

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1926-11-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1942

2 state decisions

Relies on 17 Ala. App. 527 - Terry v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-11-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

RICE, J.

¶1 There was a general verdict of guilty under an indictment containing counts charging distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and unlawfully being in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited* liquors. On this appeal, prosecuted by the defendant from the judgment of conviction which followed, the bill of exceptions does not contain a recital that it contains all, or substantially all, of the evidence offered in the case. Any state of the evidence necessary will therefore be presumed, in order to uphold the rulings of the trial court as to evidence or charges requested. Terry v. State, 17 Ala. App. 527, 86 So. 127.

¶2 There being no error in the record, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/21/alaapp/652 · .json · Public domain