Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ala. App. 668

109 So 924

Edwards v. Gilliland

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1926

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1926-05-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1926

1 state decisions

Relies on McCord v. Bridges

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-05-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*669 BRICKEN, P. J.

¶1 Appellant filed a motion to retax the cost in the case in which he was defendant in the court below. This motion coming on to be heard, was submitted to the court, and after a hearing thereon the motion was granted in part and denied in part. Each party being taxed with one-half of all costs, including the expense of gathering the crop. Appellant reserved an exception to this ruling and brings the case here for review on the record alone.

¶2 The transcript submitted to this court does not contain the evidence that was before the trial court, there being no evidence in the record to sustain the facts alleged in the motion.

¶3 Under the authority of McCord v. Bridges et al., 207 Ala. 376, 92 So. 447, the case must be affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/21/alaapp/668 · .json · Public domain