¶1 The evidence fails to connect defendants, or either of them, with possession of the stills found. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendants. Hobdy v. State (Ala. App.) 100 So. 571; 1 Biddle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563, 99 So. 59; Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App; 176, 95 So. 830; Farmer v. State, 19 Ala. App. 560, 99 So. 59; Medders v. State, 19 Ala. App. 628, 99 So. 776; Watts v. State, 19 Ala. App. 549, 98 So. 914. Reversed and remanded.
21 Ala. App. 669
105 So 923
Etheridge v. State
Decided June 30, 1925
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1925-06-30
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1944
1 state decisions
Relies on 19 Ala. App. 176 - Moon v. State · 19 Ala. App. 563 - Biddle v. State · 19 Ala. App. 560 - Farmer v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-06-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →