Garrett v. State

¶1 Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by distilling, etc., liquors, a part of which was alcohol. The case is merely “e pluribus unum.” There is nothing new or novel involved. The evidence was ample to support the conviction. There is no merit in the single exception reserved upon the taking of testimony in the case. The oral charge of the court was free from error. The record is regular. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.