Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ala. App. 675

106 So 918

Hobby v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1926

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1926-01-12

Decided 1926-01-12

RICE, J.

¶1 Appellant was convicted of a felony. There is no bill of exceptions. Neither is the oral charge of the court set out in the record. The charges refused to appellant will not be considered. There appearing no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

/21/alaapp/675 · .json · Public domain