¶1 Appellant was convicted of a felony. There is no bill of exceptions. Neither is the oral charge of the court set out in the record. The charges refused to appellant will not be considered. There appearing no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
21 Ala. App. 675
106 So 918
Hobby v. State
Decided January 12, 1926
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1926-01-12
Decided 1926-01-12