¶1 There is no bill of exceptions, and the only question presented by the record is the right of the clerk of the circuit court to issue the warrant of arrest returnable to the circuit court. The action of the lower court in holding this to be authorized by local statute is affirmed, on authority of Roseberry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 450, 103 So. 898; Reese v. State, 16 Ala. App. 430, 78 So. 460; Daniel v. State, 20 Ala. App. 677, 104 So. 920. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
21 Ala. App. 685
108 So 925
Mathias v. State
Decided April 20, 1926
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1926-04-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1928
1 state decisions
Relies on 16 Ala. App. 430 - Terry v. State · 20 Ala. App. 450 - Roseberry v. State · 20 Ala. App. 677 - Cusimano v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-04-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →