Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 APPDC 186 - In re Klemm

In re Klemm’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 1921
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. Rowley · Grant v. Walter · Ryan v. Hard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the act or improvement be the mere modification, variation, or carrying forward of the principle involved in a previous invention or discovery, a patent will be denied. No patent should issue, nor will it be valid if issued, for an improvement which is merely a new application of knowledge already possessed by those skilled in the art.” In re Klemm, 21 App. D. C. 186 , 190.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.