Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 APPDC 314 - Mankey v. Willoughby

Mankey v. Willoughby’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1934
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1934

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

101903191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Brown · King v. Baldwin · Talty v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co. · Mathews v. . Aikin · Jarvis v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The case as thus presented, apart from the matters of defense, is plainly within the established principle, that a surety, or a party who stands in the position of a surety, such as indorser or guarantor, is entitled to receive and to be subrogated to all the rights and remedies of the creditor whose debt he has been required to pay, as to any security, fund, lien or equity, which the creditor had against any other person or property, on account of such debt. This right of the surety to be subrogated, on the payment of the debt, to the securities held by the creditor, does not depend upon contract, but rests upon principles of justice and equity. The surety is entitled to have the security in the same plight and condition in which it stood in the creditor’s hands, and is entitled to all the remedies thereon that were available to the creditor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.