Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ariz. 205

Hockett v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1920

Arizona Supreme Court · decided 1920-01-24

<p>Criminal Raw — Record Searched eor Fundamental Error. — Where the Supreme Court has nothing before it but the record to consider, it will examine the -same for fundamental error.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1965

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1920-01-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1From a conviction of violating the state liquor laws in transporting liquor within the state the appellant prosecutes this appeal. The conviction was had in February, 1919. The record was filed in this court in April, 1919. At the call of the January, 1920, calendar "the case stood upon the record, and it was ordered submitted thereon.

¶2We have examined the record for fundamental error, and, finding none, the judgment will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

/21/ariz/205 · .json · Public domain