Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 ARIZ 247 - Bouldin v. Sheerer

Bouldin v. Sheerer’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1961
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Putnam v. Putnam · Wolfley v. Gila River Irrigation Co. · Daggs v. Hoskins · Daggs v. Field · Maricopa County v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. [Authorities cited.] The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.