Frame v. Mahoney’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1980
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co. · Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Bigelow · Camden Land Co. v. Lewis · 35 Cal. App. 778 - James v. P. B. Steifer Mining Co. · Mason v. Carrothers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are also of the opinion that the issuance of the stock to Frame was in violation of section 6, article 14, of the Constitution of this state, which provides: ‘No corporation shall issue stock, except to bona fide subscribers therefor or their assignees. . . . All fictitious increase of stock or indebtedness shall be void.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A bona fide subscriber is one who actually turns over to the corporation something of value in lieu of the stock issued to him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Andrews v. Chase
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.