21 Ariz. App. 139 - Terrell v. Industrial Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wammack v. Industrial Commission of Arizona · Beck v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company · 10 Ariz. App. 532 - Godwin v. Industrial Commission · 20 Ariz. App. 559 - Greer v. Industrial Commission · 19 Ariz. App. 468 - Terrell v. Industrial Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question is whether Terrell’s petition of 10 May 1971 divested the Industrial Commission of authority to hear his petition to reopen. Arizona case law clearly holds that it does. (citations omitted) “If there is a remedy, the remedy lies with the Legislature. This opinion shall not be construed to prevent the filing of a petition to reopen during the pendency of this Court’s consideration of a prior award in relation to the same numbered claim. Such a petition to reopen merely lies dormant and cannot be acted on by the Commission until the matter pending in the Court of Appeals has reached a final determination. (citations omitted).” Terrell v. Industrial Commission, 21 Ariz.App. 139, 140 , 517 P.2d 97, 98 (1973).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.