Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ariz. App. 193 - State v. Fenton

21 Ariz. App. 193 - State v. Fenton’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 1979
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cook · Hansen v. United States · United States v. Saitta · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If at any time during the course of the proceeding it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with any provisions of this rule or any order issued pursuant thereto, the court may impose any sanction which it finds just under the circumstances, including, but not limited to: ‡ * # ifc ijC # d. Precluding a party from calling a witness, offering evidence, or raising a defense not disclosed . . ..””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘ . . . The committee’s general view . . . was that the court should seek to apply sanctions which affect the evidence at trial and the merits of the case as little as possible, since these standards are designed to implement, not to impede, fair and speedy determination of cases.’ (At p. 108)” 517 P.2d at 1087 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.