Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ariz. App. 252 - State v. Goodman

21 Ariz. App. 252 - State v. Goodman’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1992

8 state decisions

40197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States of America Ex Rel. Edgar I. Shott, Jr., Relator-Appellant v. Dan Tehan, Sheriff of Hamilton County · 178 Cal. App. 2d 92 - Gormly v. Dickinson · Jackson v. Robertson · 137 Tex. Crim. 622 - Muse v. State · State v. Cushing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no dispute in the evidence that a security of some type was sold to Mrs. Steinel by the appellant. The complaining witness stated that it was a bond, while the appellant maintained it was really an exempt corporate promissory note. In either case, the item sold was a security within the definition of A.R.S. § 44-1801, subsec. 13.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.