Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ariz. App. 271 - State v. Sutton

21 Ariz. App. 271 - State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. Bounds · 19 Ariz. App. 339 - State v. Gordon · 19 Ariz. App. 587 - State v. Postell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The legislature, in whose province is vested the right to legislate criminal penalties, has mandated that the maximum possible sentence that defendant could receive for the crime of which he was convicted was two and one-half years. In our opinion, neither the executive branch of our government through its law enforcement agencies or penal institutions, nor the judicial branch of government through its courts can thwart this legislative prerogative by extending the statutory limits. í{í í}í >|c ;Jc “Thus, to allow the executive or judicial branch of government to punish the defendant in excess of that which the legislature has allowed infringes upon the separation of powers of government and is prohibited.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.