21 Ariz. App. 337 - Burns v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1980
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stone v. Arizona Highway Commission · Klein v. Klein · State v. Culver · Schwartz v. Schwartz · 58 Cal. 2d 683 - Self v. Self
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Appellee claims that Windauer is distinguishable because the tort was intentional. We do not believe any distinction can be made between an intentional or negligent tort. The fact that the tort was intentional in Windauer was a make-weight but was not the touchstone of the decision. The real key to Windauer is that when the reasons for the disability to sue fail the tort becomes actionable.” 21 Ariz.App. at 341 , 519 P.2d at 194 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burns v. Burns
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.