Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ark. 462

Power v. Woolley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1860

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1860-07-15

<p>There is no variance between the names “Woolley” and “ Wolley.”</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1860-07-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1966

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Fairchild

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The plaintiff Woolley declared on a note executed to him, but in the note, a copy of which is set out in the declaration, his name is spelled Wolley.

¶3Power demurred for the variance between the names, the demurrer was overruled and judgment given for the note— Power appealed,, staying the execution by recognizance of himself and securities.

¶4There is no variance properly pleaded, and there is none to plead.

¶5Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

/21/ark/462 · .json · Public domain