Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ark. App. 165 - Moore v. Moore

21 Ark. App. 165 - Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Liles v. Liles · Leach v. Leach · Fred v. Asbury · Anthony v. First National Bank of Magnolia · 15 Ark. App. 19 - Linda Elenia Askew Trust v. Hopkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) the party to be estopped must intend that the conduct be acted on or must act so that the party asserting the estoppel had a right to believe it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the facts; and (4) the party asserting the estoppel must rely on the other’s conduct and be injured by that rebanee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.