Clinton v. Hake’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1965
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation Commission · 4 Smith & H. 60 - Dale v. Hartman · Reese v. Hake · Nat. Optical Stores Co., Inc. v. Bryant · Ezell v. Hake
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this Court, since the concurrence of the chancellor with the Board of Review, we think these questions of fact have been conclusively determined against petitioner’s contention. National Optical Stores, Inc., v. Bryant, 181 Tenn. 266 , 181 S. W. (2d) 139 ; Dale v. Hartman, 157 Tenn. 60 , 6 S. W. (2d) 319 ; Code sec. 10620.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.