In Re Lorenzen’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
May 1995
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. Smith · Milando v. Perrone · Bartle v. Markson · In Re McNeil · Matter of Robertson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) A case may be reopened in the court in which such case was closed to administer assets, to accord relief to the debtor, or for other cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Blossom · In Re Gray“It is clearly within the Court’s discretion to allow a case to be reopened and amended as is sought here by the Debtors. Further, such discretion may only be reversed upon a showing of clear abuse. In re Haker, 411 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.1969); Bartle v. Markson, 357 F.2d 517 (2nd Cir.1966); In re Ridill, 1 B.R. 216 (D.C.C.D.Cal.1979).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rosinski v. Boyd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.