In Re Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2016
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1127 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 706
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress was primarily concerned with corporate debtors that had filed Chapter 7 petitions, that Congress momentarily lost sight of the fact, see 11 U.S.C. § 109 (d), that individual debtors were also eligible for Chapter 11 relief, and that Congress, in light of its misgivings concerning the constitutionality and wisdom of forced repayment plans, could not have intended individual debtors to be subject to 11 U.S.C. § 706 (b) conversions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Brophy“On request of a party in interest and after notice and hearing, the court may convert a case under this chapter [7] to a case under chapter 11 of this title at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Brophy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.