Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 BR 358 - In Re Tele/Resources, Inc.

In Re Tele/Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1994
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 11 U.S.C. § 1108 · 11 U.S.C. § 1123

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Heyman v. Commerce & Industry Insurance · Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp. · Rose v. Spa Realty Associates · Bollinger Corporation Bigler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A written agreement or other written instrument which contains a provision to the effect that it cannot be changed orally, cannot be changed by an executory agreement unless such executory agreement is in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of the change is sought or by his agent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any security agreement subject to the Uniform Commercial Code”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.