Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 BTA 1068 - Harkness v. Commissioner

Harkness v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
July 1947
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · Miles v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Moir v. Commissioner · Cunningham v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By the issuance of the stock rights the corporation carved something out of the interest which theretofore was represented by each share of stock. The thing carved out was called a right, and the question is, what portion of the old share was carved out in the right. If this be known, then the cost or basis applicable to the old share can be divided accordingly between a share after the rights have been separated and the right. When either is sold, the amount of gain can be separately computed. However, it is difficult to determine exactly the proportion of the basis for gain or loss of the old share which should be assigned to the right and that which should be assigned to a share after the rights have been separated. The Commissioner later provided by regulations * * * that this allocation should be made in proportion to the respective values of the rights and the shares exclusive of the rights at the time the rights were issued, * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.