Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 B.T.A. 240

Croker v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 7, 1930

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1930-11-07

1. Taxpayer and her husband were the owners of real estate, some of which he had conveyed to her and some of which was owned jointly, and they had been engaged in buying the selling lands and… Held: attorney's fees paid by the taxpayer for defense of said suit are not deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on a trade or business. 2.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1958

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Seawell,

¶1dissenting: I do not agree with the legal conclusion reached in this case. When it is found as facts that the taxpayer and her husband were engaged in the real estate business, and that this business was “ tied ” up for two years, by suit brought by the stepson as next friend to his father and that the $6,500 attorney fee was paid to defend the suit and by the defense the business was untied, then neither the Joyce case nor the Field case cited is, in my opinion, authority for the decision.

¶2It is my opinion that the attorney fee paid under the circumstances detailed is a deductible ordinary and necessary business expense under section 214 (a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1921.

LaNsdoN, Smith, Trussell, and VaN Fossan agree with this dissent.
/21/bta/240 · .json · Public domain