In Re Halcomb’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 2 Cal. 4th 593 - DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc. (1992), 59 Cal. 2d 128 - In Re De La O (1963)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Haines · Whitley v. Superior Court · 17 Cal. 2d 432 - Miller v. McColgan · In Re Estate of Moffitt · People v. Alritre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Evidently they are inserted in the code by the publisher and as such they are not binding upon the courts. Even if the heading of this section were contained in its official enact ment, it would not govern, limit or modify nor in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of said section. (Pen. Code, §10004.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Division, chapter, article, and section headings contained herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of any division, chapter, article or section hereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.