21 Cal. 2d 224 - Bakewell v. Bakewell’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably 67 Cal. 2d 695 - Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. (1967), 33 Cal. 2d 116 - Sjoberg v. Hastorf (1948)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 2d 659 - Lyon v. Goss · Doudell v. Shoo · Zappettini v. Buckles · Gunder v. Gunder · Middleton v. Finney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t may be said that where no issue is left for future consideration except the fact of compliance or noncompliance with the terms of the first decree, that decree is final, but where anything further in the nature of the judicial action on the part of the court is essential to a final determination of the rights of the parties, the decree is interlocutory.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A consideration of the issues and of the terms of the judgment discloses that further judicial action on the part of the trial court must be had before all the rights of the parties can be finally determined. Further audit of the partnership books is required and the receiver is directed to report thereon in order that the court may ascertain the amounts due as between the partners. * * * The court did not finally determine the relative rights of the partners in the partnership assets. 11”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Levi v. Sexton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.