21 Cal. 2d 473 - Miller v. Jansen’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 1980 · most notably 214 Cal. App. 2d 826 - T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co. (1963), LaMar v. LaMar (1947)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Kidd · Donahue v. Sweeney · Campbell v. Genshlea · Ward v. Dougherty · 21 Cal. App. 2d 734 - Shaver v. Canfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A grant duly executed is presumed to have been delivered at its date.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Supreme Court there held that a duly signed and delivered instrument is presumed to have been delivered at its date, not that it was presumed to have been delivered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Estate of Galvin“Under these circumstances possession by the grantee gives rise to an inference that the instrument was duly delivered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Estate of Galvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.