Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Cal. 2d 586 - Lissner v. Baldwin

21 Cal. 2d 586 - Lissner v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 29 Cal. 2d 423 - Loring v. Town of Kingsley (1946), 37 Cal. 2d 672 - Dabney v. Philleo (1951)

27 state decisions

8019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 5 Cal. 2d 35 - Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n · Murray v. Murray · Martinovich v. Marsicano · Burris v. Kennedy · Estate of Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the adjudication of the meaning of the words 'successor in interest' ... in distinguishable situations ... is not determinative of the scope of that phrase as used by the Legislature relative to litigation in probate proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.