Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Cal. 3d 231 - People v. Pettingill

21 Cal. 3d 231 - People v. Pettingill’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

297
cited by 297 later decisions
3
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 285 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 297 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler (1978), 23 Cal. 3d 899 - Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979)

4 federal appellate · 285 state decisions

190019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Younger v. Harris · Escobedo v. Illinois · Griffin v. California · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 297 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Respect for our Constitution as `a document of independent force' [citation] forbids us to abandon settled applications of its terms every time changes are announced in the interpretation of the federal charter.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the individual indicates in any manner, at any time prior to or during questioning, that he wishes to remain silent, the interrogation must cease. At this point, he has shown that he intends to exercise his Fifth Amendment privilege; any statement taken after the person invokes his privilege cannot be other than the product of compulsion, subtle or otherwise. Without the right to cut off questioning, the setting of in-custody interrogation operates on the individual to overcome free choice in producing a statement after the privilege has been once invoked.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'I just wanted to get them off my back, and I figured the only way I could is to say something, and when the last officer talked to me, you know, for a pretty long time, I figured the only way I could was to go ahead and say something.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.