Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Cal. 4th 197 - People v. Nguyen

21 Cal. 4th 197 - People v. Nguyen’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 13 Cal. 4th 497 - People v. Superior Court (Romero) · 14 Cal. 4th 605 - People v. Gardeley · Holloway v. United States · 9 Cal. 4th 263 - Lennane v. Franchise Tax Board · 16 Cal. 4th 1210 - People v. Snook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`the term otherwise provided as punishment,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a circumstance necessarily involving a prior conviction. I would apply the plain language of the statute. NOTES [*] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of Part I of the Discussion. [1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. [**] See footnote*, ante. [3] The version of section 1170.1 in effect at the time the crime was committed provided in pertinent part:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The issue presented here is how this consecutive sentence calculation is affected by the Three Strikes law, which provides that for a defendant with one prior conviction for a `strike' (a violent or serious felony) `the determinate term . . . shall be twice the term otherwise provided as punishment for the current felony conviction.' (§§ 667, subd. (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1).)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.