Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Cal. 4th 737 - People v. Frazer

21 Cal. 4th 737 - People v. Frazer’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

163
cited by 163 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 149 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 163 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2020 · most notably 29 Cal. 4th 616 - In Re Rosenkrantz (2002), Stogner v. California (2003)

9 federal appellate · 149 state decisions

13401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Graham v. Connor · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · United States v. Marion · Albright v. Oliver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 163 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as provided in sections 799 and 800, prosecution for an offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison shall be commenced within three years after commission of the offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(B) The crime involved substantial sexual conduct, as described in subdivision (b) of Section 1203.066, excluding masturbation that is not mutual, and there is independent evidence that clearly and convincingly corroborates the victim's allegation. No evidence may be used to corroborate the victim's allegation that otherwise would be inadmissible during trial. Independent evidence does not include the opinions of mental health professionals.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hatever its nature for various state law purposes . . . the statute of limitations is not an `element' of the offense insofar as the `definition' of criminal conduct is concerned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.