Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 CALAPP2D 217 - Redemeyer v. Carroll

Redemeyer v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
September 1967
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1967

19 state decisions

1101937194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 129 Cal. App. 454 - Bernstein v. Dodik · 57 Cal. App. 670 - Wells v. Dias · 10 Cal. App. 544 - Silva v. Hawn · 93 Cal. App. 512 - County of Los Angeles v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. · 41 Cal. App. 139 - Monroe v. Pleasants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘One line of cases holds that the claimant is required to show that there was no assessment of the property claimed adversely, or if assessed that the taxes were paid. Another line of cases holds that the burden rests on defendants to show that there was an assessment. It appears, however, that those cases which cast the burden upon the claimant involve title in fee, and not an easement. On the other hand, the law does not require an easement to be assessed. . . . And the burden of showing that taxes have been assessed is upon the party contesting the claim of adverse possession. . . .’ ” (Citing cases.) See, also, Smith v. Smith, 21 Cal.App. 378 [ 131 P. 890 ]; Bernstein v. Dodik, supra; City of Gilroy v. Kell, 67 Cal.App. 734 [ 228 P. 400 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. McMorris v. Pagano

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.