21 Cal. App. 2d 488 - People v. Epstein’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1965
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevitt · 90 Cal. App. 657 - People v. Dukes · 75 Cal. App. 181 - People v. Mechler · 96 Cal. App. 215 - People v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The law is settled that a judgment will not be set aside in any case on the ground of (a) misdirection of the jury or (b) improper admission or rejection of evidence, unless there has been a miscarriage of justice. Article 6, sec. 4^, Constitution of the State of California. Therefore, conceding without deciding that the trial court’s rulings were erroneous, defendant may not urge them as error in this court, in view of his confession that he participated in the crimes with which he was charged. Thus there was no prejudice or miscarriage of justice resulting to him.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lindsay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.