Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 CALAPP2D 540 - Bacon v. Bacon

Bacon v. Bacon’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
December 1976
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 1976 · most notably 18 Cal. 3d 660 - Marvin v. Marvin (1976), 88 Cal. App. 2d 708 - Lazzarevich v. Lazzarevich (1948)

28 state decisions

20019371940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 98 Cal. App. 400 - Jeffords v. Young · 132 Cal. App. 283 - Strauss v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance · Aalwyn's Law Institute v. Martin · 1 Cal. App. 390 - De Leonis v. Hammel · 107 Cal. App. 230 - Hanchett v. Wiseley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plaintiff’s lack of good faith in alleging the belief that she had entered into a valid marriage would not, however, preclude her from recovering property to which she would otherwise be entitled. If a man and woman live together as husband and wife under an agreement to pool their earnings and share equally in their joint accumulations, equity will protect the interests of each in such property. . . . Even in the absence of an express agreement to that effect, the woman would be entitled to share in the property jointly accumulated, in the proportion that her funds contributed toward its acquisition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While it is true that the complaint of the appellants stated facts constituting only a suit to quiet title, the answer of the grantee Lorenz set up new matter and asked for affirmative relief, praying that the title be quieted in him. The new matter in the answer is deemed to have been denied and in spite of the nature of plaintiffs’ original action, they have a right to interpose, against the defendants’ claim of legal title, any equitable claim which they may possess, and upon a proper showing the grantee’s title should be quieted subject to the valid equitable claim of the appellants.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘The authorities cited abundantly show that under the provisions of section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure the court, in an action involving adverse claims to real property prosecuted upon a complaint seeking to quiet title of the plaintiff, may enter such judgment as the equities of the case require, and provide for the establishing and enforcing of such trusts in relation to the property involved as the equities of the case justify or demand.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.