21 Cal. App. 2d 734 - Shaver v. Canfield’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 1980 · most notably 41 Cal. 2d 202 - Gudelj v. Gudelj (1953), 227 Cal. App. 2d 675 - Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304 (1964)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHugh · Williams v. Kidd · Kenniff v. Caulfield · Hibberd v. Smith · Bias v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In considering the facts in this case we must keep in mind, as said in Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHugh, 166 Cal. 140 [ 134 P. 1157 ], that '... in examining the sufficiency of the evidence to support a questioned finding, an appellate court must accept as true all evidence tending to establish the correctness of the finding as made, taking into account, as well, all inferences which might reasonably have been thought by the trial court to lead to the same conclusion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.