Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Cal. App. 4th 1623 - People v. Bey

21 Cal. App. 4th 1623 - People v. Bey’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2015

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona · Arizona v. Fulminante · Harris v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Appellant]: Well, if I’m being charged with something, I’d rather not have anything else to say until I have an attorney. [Detective Bennett]: Okay? Let me explain something for you, James. I’m going to continue to ask you questions. Now, you realize that you didn’t waive your rights. That means we can’t use ’em in court. [Detective Crosby]: I think James is familiar with out [unintelligible] outside Miranda. Are you familiar with that, James? [Appellant]: I don’t — I don’t know too much about the law. I’m just telling you I know to keep my mouth shut [unintelligible] somebody to put me in jail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We . . . are compelled to conclude that under these circumstances, appellant's statements were coerced and involuntary, and should not have been introduced to impeach his trial testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “very troubling case, presenting a deliberate police violation of Miranda coupled with a misrepresentation to appellant about the legal consequences of that violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.