21 Cal. App. 4th 952 - People v. Dickey’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably In the Interest of S.J. (1998), 110 Cal. App. 4th 171 - People v. Medina (2003)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Minnesota v. Dickerson · 9 Cal. 3d 156 - People v. Lawler · Badillo v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Faulks · People v. Sacrite“... add[ed] nothing' to the reasonable suspicion determination because 'in every encounter with a citizen by the police, the citizen may potentially be armed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“could not be justified based on the fact that [the defendant] (1) had no identification, (2) exercised his Fourth Amendment right and refused to allow the deputy to search the vehicle, (3) was nervous and sweating, (4) or because baking powder was found in a film canister. None of these considerations, considered singly or in combination, would lead an officer to `”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.